Sometimes it's the smallest slice of a project that demands the most ingenuity. What seemed like a simple enhancement to a Saved Search ended up stretching my understanding of NetSuite’s formula logic—and my patience.
🔍 The Objective
I needed to compare two types of project actions occurring within a 30-day window. Here’s the twist: Project Actions are a custom child record of a NetSuite Project (Job), and they’re not stored in a way that makes direct comparison easy. So, I had to retrieve them through a Project Search, pulling in individual Action records via joins—first hurdle cleared.
📅 Date Math, NetSuite Style
Next came the math. I needed to calculate whether one action happened within 30 days of another, but NetSuite doesn’t make date arithmetic feel intuitive.
My first instinct was to use TO_NUMBER()
to convert the dates into values I could compute on. Spoiler: it didn’t work. So I tried a workaround—subtracting a fixed reference date (TO_DATE('01/01/2000', 'MM/DD/YYYY')
) from the actual date field. That gave me a usable numeric value.
From there, I added 30 to one date-derived value and compared it to the other. This let me flag records that didn't fall within the expected time window between the scheduled end and the response date.
♻️ Matching Actions with Summary Logic
To tie it all together, I built a Summary Saved Search. I gave one action type a positive value, and the other a negative value. If their sum wasn’t zero, I knew they didn’t properly match—exactly what I needed to surface.
Here’s the anonymized formula:
CASE WHEN {joined_project.action_type.id} = 386 AND {joined_project.related_revision_action} IS NULL THEN NVL({joined_project.scheduled_end_date}, TO_DATE('01/01/1900', 'MM/DD/YYYY')) - TO_DATE('01/01/2000', 'MM/DD/YYYY') + 30 WHEN {joined_project.action_type.id} = 388 AND {joined_project.related_revision_action} IS NULL THEN -1 * (NVL({joined_project.response_date}, TO_DATE('01/01/2999', 'MM/DD/YYYY')) - TO_DATE('01/01/2000', 'MM/DD/YYYY')) ELSE 0 END
✏️ What I Learned
- NetSuite date math demands creativity and patience.
- Static reference dates can be a clever workaround to enable meaningful comparisons.
- Summary logic lets you track imbalance elegantly when child records don’t align as expected.
It wasn’t the biggest task of the week—but it packed more problem-solving into a few lines of SQL than I anticipated. The takeaway: complexity isn’t in the size, it’s in the detail. And I may learn a better way in the future, but I found A way.
Comments
Post a Comment